logomark arrow icon-close icon-logo-gradient

Loading ...


Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the portion of solar radiation with wavelengths of 200-400 nm (nanometers). Radiation of these short wavelengths vibrates at very high frequency and is powerful enough to damage living cells and tissues.

The most energetic UVR, UV-C (200-280 nannometers) is lethal, but nearly all is absorbed by ozone and oxygen in the atmosphere. Both UV-B (280-320 nm) and UV-A (320-400 nm) radiation reach earth’s surface and are damaging to living organisms.

Although nine percent of the sun’s radiation is UVR, much less reaches Earth’s surface, because ozone (O3) in the stratosphere strongly absorbs it. For that reason, the stratospheric ozone layer is often called the ozone shield’. The thickness of the stratospheric ozone layer varies seasonally and latitudinally, owing to differences in the amount of sunlight in a region. Water vapor and aerosols also absorb UVR, so little of it reaches the sea surface or ground on very cloudy days or where air is polluted.

Man-made chemicals---particularly chloroflourocarbons (CFCs) used as refrigerants, fire suppressants, and propellants---have destroyed portions of the ozone shield during recent decades, allowing more UVR to reach Earth’s surface. These gases can be released into the atmosphere both deliberately or accidentally in the mistaken belief that they are inert. When UVR comes in contact with a CFC molecule, the cyclical reaction can repeatedly destroy ozone molecules.  

Areas of ozone thinning occur over high latitude areas, principally in spring and summer. Ozone thinning is greatest over polar areas because seasonal circular air currents trap CFCs for months at a time and high altitude ice crystals accelerate their ability to deplete ozone.

A one percent decrease in overhead ozone allows one percent more UV-B light at 310 nm and three percent more at 305 nm to reach Earth’s surface.

UVR reaching earth's surface not only directly harms living tissue and materials such as paint or rubber, but it also reacts with chemicals in the air to produce ozone, which is so reactive that it harms or destroys both living (e.g. skin, lungs) and non-living (e.g. rubber, plastic, paint) materials.  

Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Ocean Interaction

How Was It Measured?

Data from two different satellites were used to obtain daily Local Noon Erythemal UV Irradiance (mW/m2) data: the Earth Probe/TOMS and Aura/OMI satellites (descriptions available here). UV Radiation was measured as the number of times in each 1-degree cell, that the monthly average exceeded the climatological mean +1 standard deviation These values were summed across the 12 months to provide a single value, ranging from 0-19. This was done separately for each satellite, since irradiance values were not perfectly synchronous between them.    

All pressures have different affects on different goals. For each goal, the affect of each pressure is weighted 'low' (1), 'medium' (2) or 'high' (3). The actual data-derived value of the pressure is then multiplied by the weight assigned to it for that goal. That process is repeated for each pressure-goal combination.  The sum of those values divided by 3 (the (the maximum pressure-goal value) expresses the total affect of that pressure on the goal. 

UV Radiation has low effect (weight = 1) on Natural Products (Coral), Coastal Protection (Coral), and Biodiversity (Habitats-Cora, and Species).

What Are the Impacts?

Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) & The Ozone Depletion Process


UV-B damages the tissues of terrestrial plants, terrestrial animals and marine organisms, including plant and animal plankton (Hader et al. 2003). While many plants, including mangroves, sea grasses, salt marsh grasses, seaweeds and some phytoplankton algae can protect themselves by manufacturing protective pigments that function as “sunscreens,” UV-B can impair early larval developmental stages of fish, shrimp, crabs, and other animals.

Tropical corals are exposed to high levels of UVR. They are restricted to warm, clear, relatively shallow water and high light intensity because much of their nutrition is provided by symbiotic photosynthetic algae (zooxanthellae). Corals produce chemicals that absorb UVR or act as anti-oxidants, as UVR can injure their skeletons, depress photosynthesis of zooxanthellae, harm coral larvae and contribute to ‘coral bleaching’.

Increased levels of UVR associated with stratospheric ozone depletion could overwhelm such natural defenses.

UVR increased mutation rates and negatively affected reproduction and development in attached seaweeds and in many species of phytoplankton algae (Häder et al. 2007).  UVR was identified as the major factor causing algal zonation in the intertidal zone. 


UV-B causes sunburn, induces skin cancers, degrades elastin in the skin, causes cataracts in the lens of the eye, suppresses immune response to Herpes simplex virus, slows healing of skin wounds and may harm the spleen. Reduction of overhead ozone by one percent increases skin reddening or sunburn by about one percent, but increases the incidence of skin cancers by two to three percent (United Nations Environment Program 1994).

By the end of September 2011, the South Polar ozone hole reached Southern Argentina, Chile, and the Falkland Islands with stratospheric ozone concentrations  decreased by 40%. Residents were warned to wear protective sunscreen, a hat and sunglasses with a UVR rating if they went outside during the peak hours of exposure.

UV light that penetrates through the stratosphere into the lower atmosphere also causes harm by reacting with oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emitted by factories, electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents to form ozone and smog. Smog levels could rise in coming years if emission from fossil fuel combustion remains high, because higher temperatures associated with climate warming accelerate the chemical reactions that form ground level ozone (Knowlton et al. 2011).

Nationwide ozone smog in 2002 exposed nearly 288 million Americans to pollution above the maximum health-based standard, which was then 80 ppb of ozone. It caused premature deaths of 795 people, hospitalization of 4,150 people and more than 365,000 outpatient visits.

Because ozone itself is so reactive, at ground level it harms human, animal and plant tissues and also damages materials such as paint and rubber.


Health costs related to ozone smog pollution can escalate health-related costs for families, businesses and communities. Costs of the 2002 U.S. ozone event were $6.5 billion.

UV Radiation can negatively impact the tourism industry due to increased exposure and climate change.

Reductions in commercial fish populations due to UV-B exposure and climate change can impact potential annual revenues.

Some of the world’s most important food crops are particularly vulnerable to increased UVR, which reduces growth, photosynthesis and flowering in wheat, rice, barley, oats, corn, soybeans, peas, tomatoes, cucumbers, cauliflower, broccoli and carrots.

The costs of replacing plastic, rubber, paint and other materials degraded by UVR and ground level ozone are significant.

What Has Been Done?

The Montreal Protocol, first signed in 1987, is said to be the most successful international agreement in history, and perhaps the first truly global agreement. Most countries have already phased out production of chloroflourocarbons (CFCs) and have replaced them with hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), which are less damaging to the ozone shield. The next stage will be to eliminate HCFCs entirely and replace them with hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are thought to be non-damaging to stratospheric ozone.  On September 21, 2011, the United Nations held a Montreal Summit, at which 200 countries agreed to eliminate hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) by 2020 (developing nations were given until 2030). Replacement of all refrigerants, fire suppressants and propellants by HFCs would eliminate UVR problems caused by the ozone hole, but it would increase global warming, because some HFCs trap heat up to a thousand times more effectively than does CO2. Negotiations are underway to modify the Montreal Protocol so that the most harmful HFCs can be regulated or phased out.   

National Geographic

Get More Information

Environmental Health and Safety Online (EHSO)

EHSO provides information and resources pertaining to the science of ozone depletion.

Estacion de Fotobiologia Playa Union (EFPU)

A comprehensive list of scientific publications addressing the effects of UVR on phytoplankton productivity and related topics.

The Ozone Hole

An organization dedicated to protecting the ozone layer by raising public awareness on an international level.


Battaglia, B., J. Valencia and D.W.H. Walton (eds.) (1997). Antarctic Communities: Species, Structure and Survival.  Cambridge Univ. Press. 464 pp.

Cullen, J.J. and M.P. Lesser (1991). Inhibition of photosynthesis by ultra-violet radiation as a function of dose and dosage rate: results for a marine diatom.  Mar. Bio. 111:183-190.

Gunson, J. R., S.A. Spall, T.R. Anderson et al. (2006). Climate sensitivity to ocean dimethylsulphide emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (7).

Halpern, B.S., S. Walbridge, K.A. Selkoe, C.V. Kappel, F. Micheli, C.D’Agrosa, J.F. Bruno, K.S. Casey, C. Ebert, H.E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H.S. Lenihan, E.M.P Madin, M.T. Perry, E.R. Selig, M. Spalding, R. Steneck and R. Watson. (2008).  A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319: 948-952.

Häder, D-P., H.D. Kumar, R.C. Smith and R.C. Worrest. (2003). Aquatic ecosystems effects of solar ultraviolet radiation and interactions with other climatic change factors. Photocem. Photobiol. Sci. 2003(2): 39-50. 

Häder, D.-P., H.D. Kumar, R.C. Smith and R.C. Worrest. (2007).  Effects of solar UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. published online January 25, 2007. Doi: 10.1039/b700020k.

Halaci, S.R., V.E. Villafañe, R.J. Gonçalves and E.W. Helbling. (2011). Long-term UVR effects upon phytoplankton natural communitiesof Patagonian coastal waters.  Chap. 13, pp. 229-248, In: I. Atazadeh (ed.) Biomass and Remote Sensing of Biomass. InTech. Sept. 2011. 262 pp.

Halpern, B.S., K.A. Selkoe, F. Micheli and C.V. Kappel. (2007).  Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of global marine ecosytems to anthropogenic threats.  Conserv. Biol. 21(5): 1301-1315. 

Hoegh-Guldburg, O., P.J. Mumby, A.J. Hooten et al. (007). Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification.

Knowlton K, Rotkin-Ellman M, Geballe L, Max W, Solomon G. (2011). Health costs of six climate change-related events in the United States, 2002-2009. Health Affairs, 2011; 30(11) p.2167-2176.

Manney, G.L., M.L. Santee, M. Rex et al. (2011).  Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011.  Nature October 3, 2011.  doi: 10-1038/nature10556.

Marchant, H. (1997). Impacts of ozone depletion on Antarctic organisms. Chap. 51, pp. 367-374 In: Battaglia, B., J. Valencia and D.W.H. Walton (eds.) 1997. Antarctic Communities: Species, Structure and Survival. Cambridge Univ. Press. 464 pp.

Smith, R.C., B.B. Prezelin, K.S. Baker et al. (1992). Ozone depletion: ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology in Antarctic waters.  Science 255(5047): 952-959.

Error Server error

Error 500 Server error

Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) on line 0 in file Unknown.